Bacterial Filtration Efficiency of Different Masks

Authors

  • Tamara Košir National Institute of Biology, Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, Slovenia
  • Katja Fric National Institute of Biology, Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, Slovenia
  • Arijana Filipić National Institute of Biology, Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, Slovenia
  • Polona Kogovšek National Institute of Biology, Department of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2022.34

Keywords:

bacterial filtration efficiency, face coverings, masks, respirators, Andersen Cascade Impactor, EN 14683:2019

Abstract

Face coverings, such as surgical masks and respirators, have an important role in preventing bacterial and viral transmission, especially during a global pandemic like COVID-19. Therefore, to secure their availability, new manufacturers and the use of novel materials must be encouraged. However, masks and their materials must first be properly tested for safety and efficiency, as required by the relevant standard, valid in a specific region. All standards prescribe determination of the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of masks. In this study, we report the establishment of a test method for the BFE of face masks in accordance with European standard EN 14683:2019, by which we tested 52 samples, each composed of 3 to 5 subsamples, of surgical and cloth masks, respirators, filters, and mask materials. Forty-seven out of the 52 samples reached a BFE above 75 %. Of these, 16 samples had a BFE of 75 % to 95 %, 3 had a BFE of 95 % to 98 %, while 28 reached a filtration efficiency above 98 %. Our findings show that all tested samples provided some level of protection, most of which met the requirements for the national or European market.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-04-20

How to Cite

Košir, T., Fric, K., Filipić, A., & Kogovšek, P. (2022). Bacterial Filtration Efficiency of Different Masks. Strojniški Vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 68(4), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2022.34