Numerical Analysis on a Constant Rate of Kinetic Energy Change Based a Two-Stage Ejector-Diffuser System

Authors

  • Virendra Kumar Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, India
  • Anil Kumar Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, India
  • Surendra Kumar Yadav K R Mangalam University, India
  • Anshul Yadav CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, India
  • Lalta Prasad National Institute of Technology, India
  • Jerzy Adam Winczek Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2021.7538

Keywords:

ejector-diffusor, CRKEC, two-stage ejector, single-stage ejector, CFD

Abstract

Supersonic ejector energy flow devices are extensively used in various applications, such as pumping, mixing, compression, etc. The conventional single-stage ejector (SSE) design approaches are inefficient for modelling an efficient ejector because of their inefficiency in minimizing mixing losses in the mixing chamber, thermodynamic shock in constant area diffuser, and utilization of redundant discharged momentum at the exit of the first stage. The physics-based single-stage ejector design has better solutions because it minimizes irreversibility due to thermodynamic shocks. The present study utilizes the constant rate of a kinetic energy change physics-based approach to design a two-stage ejector (TSE) for water vapour. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool ANSYS-Fluent has been utilized to predict flow characteristics. The performance of the ejector-diffuser system has also been compared with a single-stage ejector. It is found that the performance of TSE is 70 % higher than that of the performance of SSE.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-05-25

How to Cite

Kumar, V., Kumar, A., Yadav, S. K., Yadav, A., Prasad, L., & Winczek, J. A. (2022). Numerical Analysis on a Constant Rate of Kinetic Energy Change Based a Two-Stage Ejector-Diffuser System. Strojniški Vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 68(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2021.7538